
This study is the first to provide real-world evidence demonstrating that sequential treatment with two distinct commercial BCMA CAR-T cell therapies is safe and effective for patients with refractory multiple myeloma. The duration of response from the initial CAR-T treatment can predict subsequent therapeutic outcomes, offering critical guidance for retreatment strategies in relapsed patients.
Literature Overview
This article titled 'Sequential BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Refractory Multiple Myeloma', published in the journal Blood Advances, retrospectively analyzed real-world data from 10 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who experienced disease progression after initial BCMA CAR-T treatment and subsequently received a second CAR-T therapy. The study evaluates the safety and efficacy of sequential CAR-T treatments while analyzing the impact of duration of initial response on subsequent outcomes.
Background Knowledge
Multiple myeloma is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells. BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) represents a key target for current CAR-T cell therapies. Although multiple BCMA-targeted CAR-T products have received regulatory approval, safety and efficacy data regarding sequential treatment after relapse remain limited. This study fills critical gaps in real-world evidence for sequential application of two commercial CAR-T products (ide-cel and cilta-cel). Findings indicate that the duration of initial response serves as an important predictor for second CAR-T efficacy, while BCMA antigen loss is not the primary relapse mechanism, suggesting alternative resistance pathways such as T-cell exhaustion or immunosuppressive microenvironments may be involved.
Research Methods and Experiments
The study employed a multicenter retrospective analysis design, including 10 RRMM patients who progressed after ide-cel treatment and subsequently received cilta-cel therapy. All patients underwent standardized CAR-T cell manufacturing and infusion protocols. The research evaluated CAR-T cell expansion dynamics, response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and minimal residual disease (MRD) status, while analyzing correlations between initial response duration and secondary treatment outcomes.
Key Conclusions and Perspectives
Research Significance and Prospects
This research provides preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility and efficacy of sequential administration of different BCMA CAR-T products for managing post-treatment relapses in RRMM patients. Future prospective studies should validate this strategy while investigating resistance mechanisms including T-cell exhaustion and immunosuppressive microenvironments to optimize retreatment protocols.
Conclusion
This real-world study represents the first evaluation of sequential BCMA CAR-T therapy in RRMM patients, demonstrating its safety and efficacy particularly for patients with prolonged initial response duration. Findings suggest antigen loss is not the primary relapse mechanism, implicating T-cell exhaustion or other immune escape pathways. Future research should investigate strategies to enhance CAR-T persistence and develop novel approaches to overcome resistance mechanisms.

