
This study systematically summarizes the sequencing application of BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting immunotherapies in multiple myeloma, providing evidence-based practical recommendations to help optimize patient treatment strategies.
Literature Overview
The article titled 'Sequencing BCMA- and GPRC5D-Targeting Immunotherapies in Multiple Myeloma: Practical Guidance from the European Myeloma Network,' published in the journal HemaSphere, reviews and summarizes current strategies for sequencing BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeted immunotherapies in multiple myeloma (MM), including clinical evidence and mechanisms of drug resistance for newer therapies such as CAR T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The article highlights the importance of patient and tumor characteristics, drug availability, and impact on treatment efficacy. It also discusses drug resistance mechanisms, such as antigen escape, decline in T-cell function, and expansion of drug-resistant T-cell clones, providing valuable practical guidance for clinicians.
Background Knowledge
Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterized by high heterogeneity and refractoriness, especially in the relapsed or refractory setting. In recent years, immunotherapies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and GPRC5D, such as CAR T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates, have significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients. However, challenges remain in the sequencing and combination strategies of these therapies, as antigen loss, reduced T-cell fitness, and expansion of drug-resistant clones may all affect treatment effectiveness. Optimizing treatment sequences to enhance efficacy, reduce toxicity, and improve cost-effectiveness remains a key focus of research. This article systematically reviews sequencing strategies based on multiple clinical trials and real-world data, providing evidence-based, practical recommendations with significant implications for clinical practice.
Research Methods and Experiments
The article evaluates the efficacy and safety of various BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeted immunotherapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma based on data from multiple clinical trials and retrospective real-world analyses. It covers the application of CAR T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates across different lines of treatment, analyzing the impact of antigen expression changes, T-cell fitness, treatment intervals, and resistance mechanisms on therapeutic outcomes. The study compares the performance of different drugs in treatment sequences, explores the impact of treatment intervals on efficacy, and proposes that switching between targets may be a more effective strategy.
Key Conclusions and Perspectives
Research Significance and Prospects
This study provides evidence-based practical guidance for clinicians on how to rationally sequence BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeted immunotherapies. It emphasizes the importance of antigen target switching and treatment intervals. Future studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm the optimal sequencing strategy. Additionally, research into gene-editing or iPSC technologies to enhance T-cell function and improve treatment durability remains a promising avenue.
Conclusion
This article systematically reviews the sequencing strategies for BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeted immunotherapies in multiple myeloma. It identifies antigen loss, reduced T-cell fitness, and expansion of drug-resistant clones as key mechanisms that affect subsequent treatment efficacy. CAR T-cell therapy should be prioritized, while bispecific antibodies or ADCs are better reserved for later lines of treatment to avoid compromising T-cell quality. Furthermore, switching antigen targets and incorporating appropriate treatment intervals can significantly enhance therapeutic outcomes. The article also emphasizes that while multiple targeted therapies have been approved, optimizing treatment sequencing to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity remains a critical challenge in clinical practice. Future studies should focus on validating current evidence-based recommendations through randomized controlled trials and exploring novel gene-editing or cell-engineering approaches to improve treatment durability and anti-tumor activity.

